We’ve all seen them. The big, white houses that show up almost overnight, transforming rows of tidy ranch houses into wide, gaping mouths with a few ill-spaced giant buck teeth. Soon, there’s another. And another. Before you know it, the entire neighborhood seems to be in the process of turning over on itself.
I’ve seen it happen in real time as I ride my bike all over east Dallas. I clock about 75 miles a week, and my irritation builds with every mile: Who builds these? Why would they want to? What do the neighbors think? Monster homes have long been the mark of suburban tract-house developments, and now they’re taking aim at well-established city neighborhoods like mine.
Why is this happening, and why does it bother me so much? Ahead, I’ll take a look at what’s behind the trend and also examine broader themes at play behind these neighborhood transformations.
For Sale: A $500,000 Teardown
Dallas has long been a teardown town. Right now, the city is embroiled in a fight over our Brutalist, I.M. Pei–designed City Hall, which was slated for demolition to entice the Dallas Mavericks to stay downtown. (The Mavs recently said no thanks and are moving to the ‘burbs, though the fate of City Hall is still in limbo.) Plenty of other historic and not-so-historic buildings around the city have succumbed to the wrecking ball over the years.
So it shouldn’t surprise me when I see the For Sale signs on my rides. It’s Texas, land of the wide open spaces, after all. At over 9,000 square miles, the Dallas–Ft. Worth Metroplex is roughly the size of New Hampshire—I should probably be happy for more urban density, not less. And as the daughter of a custom home builder, I benefited directly from the fact that people want to build beautiful new homes for their families.
But when the For Sale sign hits the yard of a modest ’60s rambler, I brace myself. First, the roll-off Dumpster arrives, then the bulldozer. The next time I ride by, the studs are exposed like a picked-over Thanksgiving turkey. Another week or two and the lot is empty, smoothed over and ready for dirt work. The underground plumbing is laid, the slab is poured, and it’s only a matter of time before the big white house begins to take shape.
It’s Going to Be One of Two Things
Next, trees come down, the yard gets smaller and the house stretches upward and outward toward the property lines. Having been around construction all of my life (I’m also a non-practicing electrician), I can usually guess what’s coming by the time the slab is laid. It’s either a stark, boxy contemporary or a white, possibly grey or cream, farmhouse-style with a black roof.
Architecturally, they’re not unattractive. Especially the contemporary ones. These would be stunners if they weren’t 5,000 square feet stuffed onto a relatively modest city lot. The farmhouses I can take or leave. Popularized by Texas’s own Chip and Joanna Gaines, there’s a deliberately inoffensive quality about them, but again, they’re just too big relative to everything else around them. Also: Can we get a splash of color?
Sometimes I imagine how the neighborly introductions go. What do you say to someone whose house now plunges your backyard into darkness? When your plants start dying because they now get shade instead of sun, do you just smile and embrace the Japanese maple? Would you borrow a cup of sugar from someone who can probably read the recipe you’re making because they ripped out all the Crepe Myrtles on the property line?
Like I said, my bike rides are long.
Why Is This So Common Now?
One reason is space. If you want to live in the city, there are only so many places that haven’t already been developed. According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), a quarter of new home construction in 2024 was either a teardown or what’s called infill development, aka a home built on an existing, underutilized lot.
In an established neighborhood, the existing homes were built decades ago—and many of them need a lot of work. The bedrooms are small, the closets are tiny, the electrical service needs updating for modern living. Bringing them up to code and adding amenities takes money, so many people (and builders) would rather just start fresh.
But … wouldn’t renovating be cheaper? Yes, but in the most desirable neighborhoods or even gentrifying ones, the cost may be worth it, especially if you’re looking at adding square footage. If you have three kids but no interest in living in the suburbs, a teardown has a lot of benefits. In essence, you’re not buying the home, you’re buying the lot in the excellent school district.
And for builders, the economics make sense too. Dallas zoning laws don’t limit square footage, so as long as you stay within the setback and lot coverage requirements, you can build a more profitable home by going larger. Plus, people like bigger homes than they used to. In 1973, the median size of a single-family home was 1,525 sq. ft. Last year, it was 2,142 sq. ft., according to the latest Census data.
But Why Do They All Look the Same?
This appears to be about appealing to the biggest swath of people. Neutral colors and ready-to-go plans (with a few tweaks and personalizations) mean builders can respond to demand quickly with popular styles that today’s homebuyers want.
And they certainly do: According to the 2025 Annual Builder Practices Survey (ABPS) by Home Innovation Research Labs, modern farmhouses and contemporary styles were the most popular builds by far, making up a combined 51% of the new-home market last year.
Why Does It Matter?
Right about now, you’re probably going, “Lady, who cares what you think?”
I agree with you! Homeowners who absolutely adore their giant farmhouses can keep right on building them—zero input from me required. But I can’t be the only person whose initial reaction to these monster homes isn’t, “How gorgeous?” but, “Good grief, another one?”
It’s not aesthetics—these homes are attractive enough. It’s more the big, fat thumb in the eye to the existing neighborhood character. New homes that lord over their more modest neighbors shift the Overton window between community and individuality dramatically toward the latter. Erecting a home that blocks the view, upends others’ privacy or forces changes in routines (and landscaping) to accommodate your new place disrupts everyone else’s sense of place too.
According to a study in the Journal of Housing Economics, the mere presence of a new giant home in the neighborhood lowers everyone else’s satisfaction with their own homes. These positional externalities prompt a race, like the old “keeping up with the Jones’s” effect: Homeowners feel compelled to improve and expand their own homes, taking on more debt. In turn, the new normal becomes not good enough, and the race continues.
And maybe that’s fine in the long run. Things change, life moves on. Anything stark, new and different prompts old geezers like me to yell at clouds. As I ride by neighborhoods that are in the later stages of turning over, I soften. When most of the homes on the block look fresh and contemporary, it’s the old ranch homes that look out of place, clinging to an era that, like me on my bike, will soon pass by.
Sources
- Census.gov: “Characteristics of New Housing (Historical)”
- Census.gov: “Characteristics of New Housing (2025)”
- Dallas City Hall: “Dallas Zoning Districts”
- NAHB: “Eye on Housing”
- Journal of Housing Economics: “The long-run effects of minimum lot size zoning on housing redevelopment”
- Home Innovation Research Labs: “What the 2025 Builder Survey Reveals About U.S. Home Design Trends”
- PDG Real Estate: “The Teardown Trend: What It Means For DFW Buyers And Sellers”
- Journal of Public Economics: “The McMansion effect: Positional externalities in U.S. suburbs”
The post Why Do Houses All Look the Same Now—And Why Are They All White? appeared first on Family Handyman.
Article source here: Why Do Houses All Look the Same Now—And Why Are They All White?
No comments:
Post a Comment